The Minnesota statutes involving custody, parenting time, joint physical custody, and grandparent/third party custody reference the “Best Interests of the Child”. This term of art is set forth in Subdivision 1(a) of Minn. Stat §518.17 as:
“The best interests of the child” means all relevant factors to be considered and evaluated by the court including:
a) the wishes of the party or parties as to custody;
b) the reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient age to express preference;
c) the child’s primary caretaker;
d) the intimacy of the relationship between each party and the child;
e) the interaction and interrelationship of the child with a party or parties, siblings, and any other person who may significantly affect the child’s best interests;
f) the child’s adjustment to home, school, and community;
g) the length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity;
h) the permanence, as a family unit, of the existing or proposed custodial home;
i) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved; except that a disability of a proposed custodian or the child shall not be determinative of the custody of the child, unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interests of the child;
j) the capacity and disposition of the parties to give the child love, affection, and guidance, and to continue educating and raising the child in the child’s culture and religion or creed, if any;
k) the child’s cultural background; and
l) the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser, if related to domestic abuse that has occurred between the parents or the parties.
m) the disposition of each parent to encourage and permit frequent and continuing contact by the other parent with the child, if no related to domestic abuse that has occurred between the parents or the parties.
The statute continues on to state that the court may not use one factor to the exclusion of all others.
Further the primary caretaker factor may not be used as a presumption in determining the best interests of the child.
The court must make detailed findings on each of the factors and explain how the factors led to its conclusions and to the determination of the best interests of the child. If the court does not make complete findings, there are means to demand that the court amend its order to demonstrate how the facts support its conclusions.
Whether your concern for the best interests of your children has arise out of a custody, paternity, divorce, or other case, Atticus Family Law can help you demonstrate to the court how the best interests of your children will be best served.
I hired Atticus Family Law after I could not get my case moving forward. This was the best decision I could have made. Once Alexandra Reynolds was put on my case, she worked consistently and aggressively on ensuring
The worst thing I have ever experienced in my life, my divorce, felt like a never-ending maze of financial and emotional torment. Alexandra Reynolds was there to guide me through the process. Her ability to break things down
Alexandra and the entire team at Atticus Family Law have been nothing short of amazing during what is no doubt one of the most challenging times to navigate! Her incredibly poised and professional approach with opposing counsel and
Matthew Ludt and his team were wonderful to work with. Exceptional in communication, making sure I understood every step of the process. From attentively gathering all the details, and laying out road maps of how to proceed, to
Atticus Family Law gives its clients' a positive experience during some of the most trying times in their lives. They are professional, well established, and really care about their clients. I recommend them to anyone seeking advice or
Matt was an awesome collaborative lawyer! Worked hard to make my experience easy with little worry. Getting divorced was the easiest thing I’ve done in 2020. Matt made sure it was low stress! Highly recommend.
If I was asked to rank Atticus Family Law on a 10 scale, I would give them an 11. Choosing to end my marriage was a difficult and personal decision, and Atticus made the process seamless from beginning
110% Recommend Matt and his team! They were all so great to work with and easy to get a hold of. Each one responded quickly and answered all my questions. Thank you for all your hard work Matt,
Best service in the Twin City area!
To request a consultation, please fill out all fields, and we will follow up with you momentarily to set up an appointment.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.